Then, identify what kind of fallacy exists in his logic. Finally, in 2-3 sentences, close by explaining why Voltaire would make Pangloss use fallacious reasoning. What critique was he trying to make with this?
A fallacy is an incorrect argument in logic that can lead the ‘reasoning’ to have no strength or effectiveness against the other argument. In the book Candide, Voltaire creates a character who uses a variety of fallacious reasonings to prove their point. This character is Pangloss, a philosopher who has a major influence on the main character, Candide. Three fallacies that Pangloss uses is as provided:
1) Circular Reasoning: Circular reasoning pertains to one’s propositions that is aimed to be proven. In page 16 of the green book, Pangloss is seen demonstrating Candide that everything was created for a purpose, giving an example that, “…noses were made to wear spectacles; we therefor have spectacles.” This is an example of circular reasoning because in order to prove that everything had a purpose, he chose to say that noses were made for spectacles, when in reality, it is because of noses that spectacles are designed the way they are.
2) Argument from Authority: A fallacy including argument from authority can be seen when one or many, use the words of an ‘expert’ as ‘proof’ for an argument instead of the logic and reasoning that is provided. In page 22 of the green book, Candide is shown to live up to Pangloss’ words after he is cared for when he was about to die of hunger, “Dr. Pangloss was right when he told me that all is for the best in this world.” Although Candide has gone through countless hardships that almost led to his death, he still believes in Pangloss’ words that all is for the best (as if encountering death countless times is a good thing).
3)Post Hoc, Ergo Propter Hoc: Post Hoc, Ergo Propter Hoc is a situation which includes the idea of ‘It happened after, so it was caused by’. In the book Candide of the green book, Pangloss is seen disputing against James, an anabaptist,”All that was indispensable,… and individual misfortunes create general welfare, so that the more individual misfortunes there are, the more all is well.” Pangloss is showing a sequence of sorts that claims misfortune of an individual to be a great deed for everyone when in fact, it brings no wellbeing for the one who has the misfortune. This is an example of fallacy because once again, Pangloss uses inaccurate logic to demonstrate that everyones well being comes from misfortune.
In conclusion, Voltaire showed many fallacies on the philosopher Pangloss. His reason for doing so may be to point out that in the 1800’s, many philosophers were given such title just because they questioning the things around him. In addition, seeing as Candide easily used Pangloss’ words to assure himself, Voltaire is pointing out how gullible and naive people were when introduced to something new. He showed that people were easily persuaded when taught by what they may have seen as an authority figure.